Vote4Ben
Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 5
|
 Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:05 am Post subject: Is Fake Locke in Control of the "Infected," Claire |
 |
|
"Whether Claire is sick or not doesn’t change the fact that she is friends with a madman. She wouldn’t actually say his name, which is probably a clue to who she believes he is – and perhaps who she sees when she looks at him. Could it be that Fake Locke has the power to disguise his image to her? And if so, does this go back to my original theory that the infection is merely a way for New Locke to influence/take control of someone?"
--a snippet from my latest LostZone column, Claire’s (Freaky? Psychotic!?) Return and Sideways Significance with Jack Shephard
http://www.gamezone.com/news/02_25_10_01_01PM.htm
What do you guys think: Is Claire really sick? Is her infection more of a way for Artificial Locke to control her?
And whether she's sick or not...what does this mean for those weird scenes from S4 in which a sedated-looking Claire sat next to an overly confident Christian? |
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
